Shop Sundance Catalog

icon icon

Thursday, January 15, 2009

The Cuban Revolution. Half a Century. by Saul Landau

The Cuban Revolution. Half a Century.
by Saul Landau
Saul Landau is a senior fellow at the Institute for Policy Studies. He has produced 10 books and more than 40 films on social, political, and historical issues and worldwide human rights and is the recipient of Chile’s Bernardo O’Higgins award for human rights. 

Five Cuban intelligence agents sit in federal penitentiaries across the United States because they infiltrated anti-revolutionary groups in Miami intent on doing violence in Cuba. These five men represent a long line of those who have acted from an understanding of their roles in the long human historical drama.
The Cuban Revolution did for radical youth of the 1950s what the Bolsheviks did for their ancestors. You could play a role in history and see the results. And in the early stages they looked very good. The more cautious Mensheviks and the more radical Bolsheviks agreed that it was absurd to think of building socialism in one country. In 1917 attempts to duplicate the overthrow of capitalism failed in Europe and socialism did develop in the largest land mass in the world.

The Soviet Union endured as a painfully inefficient state-directed economy and a repressive society for some 70 years before it imploded. In 1959, Cuban leaders echoed similar sentiments. A revolution on one island? The actions of guerrillas of the mountains and the underground were rooted in a larger revolutionary context, one supplied by Bolívar, O’Higgins, and the other Latin American liberators. Cuba began to “export” revolution— at least ideas—to Caribbean islands and to the South and Central American countries as well.

By 1960, given the predictable response of Washington to any sort of disobedience, Cuba had taken its first steps toward partnership with the no longer revolutionary Soviet Union. In doing so, it got caught in the seamy fabric of the cold war. Fidel learned of the revolution’s “junior” status during the 1962 missile crisis, when Soviet Premier Khrushchev neglected to inform Cuba’s leader of his decision to withdraw the missiles.

But what other major power would have written a comprehensive insurance policy for the revolutionary island? By the early 1970s, after failing to achieve a 10-million-ton sugar harvest to gain extra foreign currency, Cuba had little choice but to adopt Soviet models in return for guaranteed aid and advantageous trade. Its graduates returned with advanced degrees, its population became literate, skilled, and healthy, and in 1975 its soldiers showed how a small island nation could play a strategic role in helping maintain the fragile independence of Angola. Twelve years later, Cuban troops helped liberate Namibia and South Africa by routing the apartheid army in the battles of Cuito Cuanavale.

In the 1970s, Vietnam won its independence, as did Laos. In Africa, Mozambique and Guinea Bissau joined Angola in freeing themselves from Portuguese rule. Nicaragua and then tiny Grenada joined the revolutionary coterie. But in the early 1980's the empire began to reverse revolutionary success and the USSR began its steep decline toward oblivion. The Sandinistas could not contain the U.S.-backed Contra forces, and Grenada’s revolution decomposed in its own inner circles. The ultra-left cabal that murdered Maurice Bishop, its leader, opened the door to a U.S. invasion in 1982. By the mid-1980's the Chinese and Vietnamese revolutions had already begun to morph into capitalist economies run by Communist parties claiming adherence to socialism.

Cuban socialism, however, refused to compromise its basic principles. Now, having survived the unflagging hostility of the world’s most dangerous and most capitalist neighbor and Soviet collapse, Cuba’s basic model persists; indeed, it underwent a smooth transition in February 2008, when its National Assembly chose Raúl as the new president to replace a convalescing Fidel.

In the Special Period that followed the demise of the Soviet Union, Cubans had to violate basic ethical tenets in order to survive. By 1991 the state could no longer guarantee an adequate diet for all citizens or maintain other subsidies as Cuban foreign trade plunged by 70 percent and standards of living fell. Buying and selling illegally to get certain goods became daily behavior patterns, hardly a stimulant for maintaining high socialist morale. Cuba legalized the dollar and adopted foreign tourism as its dubious money earner. As it did so, the gang of perpetually violent exiles attacked tourist sites and, in one of the hotel bombings, killed an Italian tourist businessman. Since the U.S. government did nothing to stop the Florida-based terror attacks, Cuba sent its agents to Miami disguised as defectors (the five plus twelve others) to discover the attack plans of groups like Brothers to the Rescue and Alpha 66. Even after Cuba had passed on to the FBI material gathered by its infiltrators, the Bureau busted the sources—the five—not the perps. The men were convicted and sentenced to long terms. The media don’t understand Cuba, nor do they try.

Understandably, U.S. public opinion remains murky on the subject. How did Fidel remain in power for nearly half a century? For one thing, the United States willingly imported his opposition and continues to do so. Current U.S. policy directs its officials to cultivate dissidents in Cuba for the purpose of destabilizing the regime, but Washington then grants these supposed troublemakers visas to join the exile ranks in the United States. Washington shares with the violent exiles an obsession with one person that makes it difficult to think clearly. Facts rarely enter policy discussions. Studied ignorance has contributed to vociferous rhetoric and policies such as limiting travel to Cuba for Cuban Americans that make little sense, except for the small hard-line Cuban exile gang in South Florida whose families have left the island. U.S. ineptitude, however, does not solve Cuba’s problems.

Aging Cuban revolutionaries, no matter how frustrated by the vicissitudes of daily life, can boast about accomplishing their goals. Cuban won its independence and has defended its revolution over 50 years against constant U.S. aggression. Cuba established a system of social justice and rights—the right to eat and to have housing, medical care, education, etc. Cubans danced on the world stage, as liberators of parts of Africa, slayers of the Monroe Doctrine, and purveyors of emergency medical teams that saved Pakistanis, Hondurans, and many others from the after effects of natural disaster. Cuban doctors rescued the vision of countless Third World people. Cuban artists, athletes, and scientists have etched their names on honor rolls throughout the world.

Those who do not land good jobs, despite possessing good education, high skill levels, and good health, feel they deserve more. Over the past decade, I’ve met dozens of Cuban youths who shrug and claim: “I don’t see much future for myself here.” This is a sign of sagging morale. Cuba also faces a dramatic shortage of teachers (8,000 officially), and an agricultural system that cannot yield enough food to meet the government’s commitments for each citizen’s ration book allocation. Indeed, Cuba had to import a good percentage of its food needs from the United States. The terrible hurricanes of 2008 have exacerbated this situation. In addition, Cuba’s wage structure does not reflect productivity or even fairness. To offer younger generations that sense of optimism that frames the future as bright opportunity rather than dark uncertainty, Raúl Castro has initiated a reform process including democratizing the party itself, recognizing the need to reflect diverse opinions. He has promised to address the multiple issues that have gone unattended. He will need to mobilize younger Cubans in the task of discussing and solving Cuba’s pressing problems, which will be difficult.

He has surrounded himself with old comrades in their mid-70s or older. Men like Machado Ventura or Ramiro Valdez have earned reputations for being less than flexible. The government will likely enjoy a windfall of oil revenues in the near future from reserves discovered off Cuba’s coast. Money does not, however, provide the cure for low morale among sectors of Cuba’s youth. And even though an Obama administration might ease some of the imperial pressures on the island, Cuba will still need help from around the world to stem overactive imperial impulses to punish disobedience—no matter how long ago.

LATIN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES,
Issue 164, Vol. 36 No. 1,
January 2009 136-138
DOI: 10.1177/0094582X08329181
© 2009 Latin American Perspectives